"When you say “except for Goebels, the others [ie Strauss -and- Meltzer] admit that Solutrean points infer Solutrean presence” that’s a distorted misrepresentation of their views. Their position is that if it were demonstrated that Solutrean points were present in North America then that would infer Solutrean people were present."
Ha Ha, I don't believe you are up to date on what has been found on the Del Marva Penninsula.
It has, is being, and will continue to be demonstrated the Solutreans were there. The search and proof of Pre-Clovis started out the same way.
Nobody looked for hard evidence of folks being in North America before Clovis because it was "Clovis first" and Archaeology was prejudiced against anything else.
Solutrean Laurel Leafs are on the Del Marva therefore this is the proof that Solutreans were there.
Now the Archaeological search for the Solutrean occupation of Eastern North America can continue.
Ha Ha, I don't believe you are up to date on what has been found on the Del Marva Penninsula.
It has, is being, and will continue to be demonstrated the Solutreans were there. The search and proof of Pre-Clovis started out the same way.
Nobody looked for hard evidence of folks being in North America before Clovis because it was "Clovis first" and Archaeology was prejudiced against anything else.
Solutrean Laurel Leafs are on the Del Marva therefore this is the proof that Solutreans were there.
Now the Archaeological search for the Solutrean occupation of Eastern North America can continue.
Comment