Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Buckeye Knoll - Early Archaic Culture 7,300 BP.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buckeye Knoll - Early Archaic Culture 7,300 BP.

    Buckeye Knoll
    Texas Beyond History Article
    A recently investigated cemetery dating to about 5300-4200 BC has revealed the existence of a relatively sophisticated and populous Early Archaic culture in the lower Guadalupe River Valley. Although only a portion of the Buckeye Knoll site (41VT98) has been excavated, the Buckeye Knoll cemetery is believed to have held at least 200 individuals, making it one of only three large mortuary sites known in North America that date 7,000-8,000 years ago. Among the varied grave offerings were elaborately ground and polished stone artifacts, such as bannerstones, plummets, and grooved quartzite stones, as well as other unusual artifacts made of non-local materials. Lead archeologist Robert A. Ricklis believes the evidence shows that the Buckeye Knoll peoples had extensive interaction with Archaic cultures of the greater Southeastern U.S. Such interaction and the existence of a large cemetery suggest that the hunter-gatherers living in the lower Guadalupe Valley 7,000 years ago were much more numerous and had established territories earlier than predicted by previous explanations.
    The Buckeye Knoll site’s ground-breaking prehistoric record and its human story is only beginning to emerge, as the analysis and final reporting is still underway. The site was investigated in 2000-2001 as part of a project undertaken by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to widen and deepen the Victoria Barge Canal, which runs through the lower Guadalupe River Valley and connects chemical plants south of Victoria to the Intracoastal Waterway. The archeological investigations were carried out by a research team led by Ricklis from the consulting firm Coastal Environments, Inc, under contract with the USACE.
    Controversy arose over conflict between scientific priorities and those of various Native American groups as well as the DuPont Corporation (now Invista) that owned the land containing the site. One of the concerns was the difficulty (or impossibility) of demonstrating ancestral relationships between the Indian tribes who lived in the area 7,000 years ago and those Indian groups that stepped forth to declare an interest in the Buckeye Knoll cemetery.
    The case attracted national, statewide, and local attention. And it all boiled down to whether the human bones and the grave goods would be reburied, with or without scientific study. After protracted negotiations involving federal and state agencies, federally recognized tribes, other Indian groups, a private corporation, and archeological organizations, a compromise was reached. The archeological team was given several years to study the remains and conduct scientific analyses.
    In April, 2006, the human remains and associated grave goods were reburied by members of the Lipan Apache Band of Texas and the Invista Corporation. From a scientific perspective, it is very doubtful that any Indian peoples speaking any of the Athapascan languages (such as Lipan Apache) are actually descendants of those who were buried at Buckeye Knoll. From the perspective of many Native Americans today, all prehistoric human remains and grave offerings belong in the ground where they were laid to rest.
    We are very hopeful that the full story of Buckeye Knoll will be told on Texas Beyond History. It is a remarkable prehistoric site of continental significance that is changing our understandings of hunter-gatherer life on the South Texas Plains. Unlike that of the nearby Morhiss Mound site, the investigation of Buckeye Knoll will reach proper and relatively timely conclusion.

  • #2
    Thanks, very interesting debate here.

    Comment


    • #3
      Jack nothing was published yet? No pictures of artifacts? Do you know or have you heard what the quartzite finds were? Soory about all the questions. Great article thanks for sharing it.
      Hoss
      TN formerly CT Visit our store http://stores.arrowheads.com/store.p...m-Trading-Post

      Comment


      • #4
        Hoss wrote:

        Jack nothing was published yet? No pictures of artifacts? Do you know or have you heard what the quartzite finds were? Soory about all the questions. Great article thanks for sharing it.
        Hoss
        __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________
        Hoss
        There have been casts made of the artifacts and I would hope that these would be put out to the public soon. Its been a long time. I need to email Dr. Hester about it. I owned a Waco Sinker that was found at the Wison County Sand Pit that Dr. Hester said looked similar to the Waco Sinkers that were found at the site. He said he did not think it was a Waco Sinker but was cerimonial in nature because of all the work that was put into it, he could not see it being wasted by throwing it at something. I will attache a picture.
        Jack
        Wilson County Sand Pit Cerimonal Artifact or Very Fancy Waco Sinker

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the interesting posts Jack. I get so wrapped up in North East stuff I dont get much exposure to TX. These articles help a lot with my own growth in Lithics and Artifacts.Thanks
          Hoss
          TN formerly CT Visit our store http://stores.arrowheads.com/store.p...m-Trading-Post

          Comment


          • #6
            Tuesday when I go to the museum, I will take some pictures of what we have from this site. There were some things, not associated with the graves that were able to be on display...I will post them then...

            Comment


            • #7
              The replicas are finished for the most part and on display

              Comment


              • #8
                very nice!
                [QUOTE]greywolf22 wrote:

                Originally posted by Hoss post=46120
                Jack nothing was published yet? No pictures of artifacts? Do you know or have you heard what the quartzite finds were? Soory about all the questions. Great article thanks for sharing it.
                Hoss
                __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________
                Hoss
                There have been casts made of the artifacts and I would hope that these would be put out to the public soon. Its been a long time. I need to email Dr. Hester about it. I owned a Waco Sinker that was found at the Wison County Sand Pit that Dr. Hester said looked similar to the Waco Sinkers that were found at the site. He said he did not think it was a Waco Sinker but was cerimonial in nature because of all the work that was put into it, he could not see it being wasted by throwing it at something. I will attache a picture.
                Jack
                Wilson County Sand Pit Cerimonal Artifact or Very Fancy Waco Sinker

                Comment


                • #9
                  Another interesting topic Jack, love the story, I think it is important to get this out there. It is indeed an interesting debate, yet an significant detail of history that should be investigated. Whomever sorts these out as it happens must be a great negotiator to get all to agree. Great read, Bill

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Bill
                    The emotions in the first meeting with the Army Core Political Correct Brown Nosiers, Dow the Concerned Citizen who did not want to piss anyone off, Apache Radical Crazy Woman, Archeologist Tom Hester and Concerned Citizens who wanted the artifacts put on public display were high. I drove from Houston to be in the meeting and learned a lot about stupidity.
                    Jack

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks for sharing
                      Gary
                      South Dakota

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X