Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The famous Vero Mammoth carving.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The famous Vero Mammoth carving.

    Sorry for the piecemeal post, i just can’t get this stuff together yet....Bull did a thing on a Mammoth bone a couple of posts ago, and it reminded me of this find,
    Click image for larger version

Name:	5C63B31C-4F0A-47B3-A303-7F02FC5EC457.jpeg
Views:	277
Size:	157.8 KB
ID:	476041 Click image for larger version

Name:	40134888-0F5C-44CF-9169-9F3458F8C766.png
Views:	138
Size:	330.1 KB
ID:	476042 Click image for larger version

Name:	9EC9941D-FA8D-4441-833C-6F0402D21387.png
Views:	123
Size:	325.0 KB
ID:	476043 Click image for larger version

Name:	53B5EF10-5975-45F4-8150-D7914DB81C0A.png
Views:	142
Size:	312.8 KB
ID:	476044 Click image for larger version

Name:	CC8B4D2C-640C-4431-8F18-16B187C436CB.png
Views:	156
Size:	371.6 KB
ID:	476045 Click image for larger version

Name:	1506DD67-D28C-4918-AA37-C71B5287AF42.png
Views:	137
Size:	285.1 KB
ID:	476046
    Floridaboy.

  • #2
    Well I got most of it.lol.,
    Floridaboy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Man I could see that in my cabinet . So a beach loving mammoth .

      Comment


      • Hal Gorges
        Hal Gorges commented
        Editing a comment
        I can just picture it..Lol.

    • #4
      Kennedy apparently made the find in 2006 or 2007 and it sat underneath his sink until the engraving was noticed during cleaning of the bone in 2009… so the context of the find is not regarded as good.

      The analysis commenced in 2009 and the results were announced in 2011. It has been authenticated, but only insofar as confirming that the carving (which cannot of course be dated) was not done in recent times with modern tools. There was “no discontinuity between the carved grooves and the surrounding material” which proves that the bone aged with the carving already on it… but doesn’t definitively prove that the bone and the carving are the same age.

      Proving that it’s not a modern fake was important because archaeologists are still embarrassed by the so-called “Holly Oak Pendant/Gorget”, allegedly found in Delaware in 1864. This was a piece of whelk shell, apparently palaeo, with a carving of a woolly mammoth. The general consensus now is that this is a modern carving (on an old shell, carbon dated at about 1,500 years), faked from a published drawing of a genuine French artefact (“La Madeleine tusk”).

      The Vero Beach bone has defied aging in the work so far… it’s too mineralised. The species from which the bone came has also not been conclusively identified – it’s either mammoth, mastodon or giant sloth… all of which died out in the region at the end of the last ice age – between 10-12,000 years ago. The carving is anatomically correct and must have been done by someone who had actually seen a mammoth or an accurate depiction of one.

      Although the dating has been widely reported as anything between 13-20,000 years BP, this is presumptive and not currently supported by analytical evidence.
      I keep six honest serving-men (they taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When and How and Where and Who.

      Comment


      • Hal Gorges
        Hal Gorges commented
        Editing a comment
        Thanks for the info, I’ve always been curious about it...I’m glad you have a diverse knowledge of things ancient and a grip on computer type technology.....
    Working...
    X