I thought I was picking up a fossil when I pulled this bone out of the dirt. The only part above ground was the whiter fossilized looking portion. I know less about bones than I do about arrowheads. Imagine my reaction to be holding this in my hand!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who knows their bones?
Collapse
X
-
Pam - it appears to be a newer bone based on the coloring and lack of wear. The whiter part of the bone was caused by the sun bleaching it out. What is the size we might be able to figure out the animal it came from. ---Chuck
Pickett/Fentress County, Tn - Any day on this side of the grass is a good day. -Chuck-
-
Pam - This pic shows three items found in a cave. The bone on the left was probably used to put the fine edges on a point. It was found on the surface and may be only 100 yrs old or so. The middle deer tine was also found on the surface in the same cave but doesn't appear to have any wear on it so it may have been debris off a deer antler. The bone on the right, shaped like a point was found about 12" underground and is probably not related to the other finds because it is substantially older as you can tell from the black color and it is really hard, not fossilized yet tho. Unfortunately it would take all of the artifacts or specimen to do any date testing, not to mention the cost. Just thought you might be interested. ---Chuck
Pickett/Fentress County, Tn - Any day on this side of the grass is a good day. -Chuck-
Comment
-
Pam - The length of the bone suggests a small type animal but that end joint on the left end as shown in your photo indicates only forward -and- backward movement, unlike a wrist joint in humans. However, you say it's 4 inches in diameter at the narrowest point which means that the joints would have to be 6 - 8 inches wide. Gonna have to do some research on that one. ---Chuck
Pickett/Fentress County, Tn - Any day on this side of the grass is a good day. -Chuck-
Comment
Comment