I went on my second hunt yesterday. This time I chose a creek that feeds year round into the main river and starting at the confluence I followed it upstream into some steeper hills for about three quarters of a mile or so. It started out quite muddy, but soon enough small gravel bars appeared and then it soon went to nothing but rock and stones. Not having eyes trained to spot artifacts I found that between the zillion of maple tree seeds and the thousands of stone pieces that wash down from stone formations along the creek that I found it hard to focus, where everything went to a mosaic and nothing stood out in particular. I realize experience plays into this but what pace should I walk at? Also, are there particular colors of stone to be looking for?
There was one stone that did jump out at me, as it did look like a point, but it had no evidences of human touch and it broke to pieces rather easily when I lightly cleaned it with a toothbrush and dish soap. This leads to another question: what, if any, cleaning should be done to dirty artifacts?
I also walked three recently plowed fields that bordered close to the creek, which were all above the immediate floodplain of the river. None of these fields had any stones, just good old black loam mixed with clay. My overall approach to selecting these fields was to go back in time and think in terms of having to find a place to set up a seasonal camp, where the river was close for water and fishing, elevated enough to avoid flooding, but reasonably level for a good camp. I realize that my thinking is both inexperienced and uneducated, as I am sure there are many other factors I have overlooked, but one has to start somewhere. Please advise on any factors I have missed.
With no experience my one concern is to spend a lot of fruitless searching in areas that are not likely to ever produce any artifacts . . . or that I walk past all kinds of artifacts and just plain miss them. Should I return and walk this creek again or should I move on? Do you cover lots of territory to find artifacts or do you methodically work an area with a fine tooth comb many times over for success? I look forward to my next hunt.
There was one stone that did jump out at me, as it did look like a point, but it had no evidences of human touch and it broke to pieces rather easily when I lightly cleaned it with a toothbrush and dish soap. This leads to another question: what, if any, cleaning should be done to dirty artifacts?
I also walked three recently plowed fields that bordered close to the creek, which were all above the immediate floodplain of the river. None of these fields had any stones, just good old black loam mixed with clay. My overall approach to selecting these fields was to go back in time and think in terms of having to find a place to set up a seasonal camp, where the river was close for water and fishing, elevated enough to avoid flooding, but reasonably level for a good camp. I realize that my thinking is both inexperienced and uneducated, as I am sure there are many other factors I have overlooked, but one has to start somewhere. Please advise on any factors I have missed.
With no experience my one concern is to spend a lot of fruitless searching in areas that are not likely to ever produce any artifacts . . . or that I walk past all kinds of artifacts and just plain miss them. Should I return and walk this creek again or should I move on? Do you cover lots of territory to find artifacts or do you methodically work an area with a fine tooth comb many times over for success? I look forward to my next hunt.
Comment